ATAF backs African governments on carbon tax

THE African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF) has pledged to support African tax
authorities including Zimbabwe in coming up with clear guidelines on how carbon taxes
canbe implemented in the fight against climate change.


An upstream carbon tax is simple to administer and can impact both the formal and the
informal economies, a point that is particularly relevant for Africa where most countries
are either middle or low-income countries, said the regional tax body in a latest
statement.


In Zimbabwe, the Government has vowed to closely regulate voluntary carbon offset
trading in a bid to curb greenwashing and ensure benefits for local communities.


The US$2 billion global voluntary carbon offset market involves companies buying
credits from emission-reducing projects such as renewable energy or planting trees to
offset their own emissions, according to a Reuters report.


Noting that organisations operating carbon credit projects in the country were largely
unregulated as they were only registered with local councils and traditional community
leaders, Government has said there is no reliable data on the size of Zimbabwe’s carbon
market. Hence authorities now want all carbon projects to be registered within the next
two months.


It will take 50 percent of all revenue from carbon projects, with foreign investors limited
to 30 percent and the balance of 20 percent going to local communities, Environment, Climate, Tourism and Hospitality Minister, Mangaliso Ndlovu, has said.


ATAF has said that its Carbon Tax Policy brief will assist African governments in
applying a carbon tax policy with a holistic approach.
   
The brief explores the key features in the design of a carbon tax that can meet the dual
objective of raising revenues while conferring a positive effect on the environment.
It starts with a descriptive overview of what carbon taxes are and how they may be
administered at national level, when employed either at the upstream or downstream
levels.


It then provides for an ample discussion of the parameters for tax rate implementation,
the definition of the tax base, and revenue use considering the African context, said
ATAF.


ATAF manager in charge of country programmes and rapid response, Sameera Khan, was
quoted as saying: “carbon taxes are amongst some of the most efficient policies in
pricing carbon, particularly if employed at ‘choke points’ at the upstream level”.


The brief also discusses the role of supplementary policies in achieving the climate goals,
with, for example, discussing the need for countries to assess and eventually eliminate
harmful fossil fuel subsidies, in line with the commitments assumed by African countries
under the Glasgow Pact.


“The lack of a robust tax policy framework that accounts for the environmental damage
resulting from private investment means that companies have ultimately been freeriding on the environment,” said Khan.


“Carbon taxes are capable of incorporating the environmental cost of doing business to a
product’s final price.”


According to ATAF, the application of national tax policies such as the recently approved
European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) means that net exporters
of covered products to the EU territory, can expect a corresponding loss in revenue
accumulation ability resulting from the difference between the carbon tax imposed at
domestic level (if any) and the adjustment measure employed at the border.


The policy brief, thus, seeks to ensure that African tax authorities will be prepared to
meet these changes.-chronicles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Share